Rome- Pope moves backwards on abuse

For immediate release: Monday, May 19, 2014

Statement by Barbara Dorris of St. Louis, Outreach Director of SNAP, the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests (314-503-0003, SNAPdorris@gmail.com)

In yet another sign that the Vatican is moving backwards on clergy sex crimes and cover ups, Pope Francis is setting up yet another church abuse panel – this one to help hear appeals of accused child molesting clerics.

http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/1402044.htm 

http://www.naharnet.com/stories/en/131260-pope-setting-up-appeal-body-for-priests-accused-of-abuse

Put quite simply: What matters most is the safety of boys and girls, not the bureaucracy for proven, admitted and credibly accused priests, nuns, seminarians, brothers and bishops.

This is another indication that the Catholic hierarchy's main focus remains on accused priests, not on vulnerable kids or wounded adults. 

Kids aren't raped by priests because Vatican officials move slowly. Kids are raped by priests because Vatican officials continue to be more worried about their colleagues' careers than their flocks' safety. 

Rather than tweak biased and secretive internal church processes, Francis should be helping to reform secular child safety laws and firing bishops who violate them. Instead of changing an inherently self-serving procedure, the Pope should be making sure his staff fully cooperate with effective secular justice systems which have long done a far better job of resolving child sex abuse and cover up cases (instead of putting themselves above such justice systems, as Italy's bishops have recently done). 

It matters little what church panels are set up and who's appointed to them, as long as top Catholic officials keep rebuffing and stiff-arming law enforcement and government officials across the globe, whether they're in Poland, Ireland or Geneva. 

Catholic parishioners and employees look to their bishops for leadership. So as long as bishops keep sheltering accused predators (like Polish Archbishop Jozef Wesolowski who's wanted by the law for molesting kids in the Dominican Republic) and sending predator priests abroad (like Fr. Carlos Urrutigoity, who abused in Pennsylvania and is now the second-in-command of a diocese in Paraguay), nothing will change.

http://www.thenews.pl/1/10/Artykul/158234,Vatican-refuses-to-extradite-Polish-archbishop-accused-of-child-sex-abuse

http://www.bishop-accountability.org/news2014/03_04/2014_03_14_Brelje_PriestIn.htm 

As long as Vatican officials ignore proven wrongdoers like St. Paul Archbishop John Nienstedt, Newark Archbishop John Myers and Kansas City Bishop Robert Finn, nothing will change. 

For decades, church officials have given every advantage, consideration and benefit of the doubt to the accused and given the accusers little except skepticism and hostility. That remains mostly true today, even though bishops profess in public to be sympathetic towards victims. So improving the appeals process for predators will only endanger more kids, intimidate more victims, discourage more whistleblowers, and help child molesting clerics stay on the job longer. 

SNAP, the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests, is the world’s oldest and largest support group for clergy abuse victims. We’ve been around for 25 years and have more than 15,000 members. Despite the word “priest” in our title, we have members who were molested by religious figures of all denominations, including nuns, rabbis, bishops, and Protestant ministers. Our website is SNAPnetwork.org) 

Contact - David Clohessy (314-566-9790 cell, SNAPclohessy@aol.com), Barbara Dorris (314-503-0003 cell, SNAPdorris@gmail.com)

Do you like this post?

Showing 6 reactions


commented 2014-05-20 18:46:19 -0500 · Flag
Sorry, one more thing. There’s a possibility that his new appellate process could turn the whole system into a revolving door for defrocked priests. That’s why it probably needs to be watched closely.
commented 2014-05-20 16:22:26 -0500 · Flag
That’s why SNAP, Jeff Anderson, etc., always use the term “credibly accused.”
commented 2014-05-20 16:09:41 -0500 · Flag
for "for proven, admitted and credibly accused priests, nuns, seminarians, brothers and bishops.” – OK
But
Not everyone accused is always "proven, admitted and credibly accused” however. Like it or not, there are still times when those not creditably accused or who have demonstrated that they were falsely accused stil some protection.
commented 2014-05-20 13:40:56 -0500 · Flag
It sounds like the only modern-day “checks and balances” that are built into this medieval, monarchical system are ones designed to protect members of the establishment, rather than ones designed to check the prerogatives of interested power players. So we are seeing the corruption of absolute power.
commented 2014-05-19 12:28:45 -0500 · Flag
I’m repeating part of your comment for more discussion:
“For decades, church officials have given every advantage, consideration and benefit of the doubt to the accused and given the accusers little except skepticism and hostility. That remains mostly true today, even though bishops profess in public to be sympathetic towards victims. So improving the appeals process for predators will only endanger more kids, intimidate more victims, discourage more whistleblowers, and help child molesting clerics stay on the job longer.”
For the most part I agree with your statement, although I might prefer to ammend your comment to read: “For decades, POPES, have given every advantage…, etc.”
I make this suggestion to you because I truly have come to believe that any pope could put an immediate end to these heinous crimes being committed on an ongoing basis by CATHOLIC priests, nuns, laity, and employees around the world.
Is there no pope who is unselfish and yet confident enough, to begin the “downsizing” of the catholic church around the world, if that is what it will take to rid the catholic heirarchy and city-state “catholic vatican business”, of pedophiles and rapists who commit their crimes in the name of the catholic church and with the pope’s and parishoner’s unspoken approval?
Believing thusly, I also look forward to reading the report of the UN Committee on Torture on the interview of the vatican officials that occurred earlier this month, to be issued on May 23rd I think it is.
I believe that the status quo in the catholic church, HAS TO STOP. I hope and pray that amidst all of the other cases of merit before the ICC (International Criminal Court), that the court in the not too distant future will in fact have the courage and agree to find time to hear the case brought to them by SNAP AND CCR. The case to bring the pope(s) and catholic church to trial for these CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY needs to go forward.
@SNAPNetwork tweeted this page. 2014-05-19 11:34:43 -0500
Our most powerful tool is the light of truth. Through our actions, we bring healing, prevention and justice.



Search & Translate
Loading