Catholic bishops promised reform in sex-abuse scandal. But they didn’t look at their own misdeeds

A Boston Globe and Philadelphia Inquirer examination found that more than 130 US bishops have been accused of failing to adequately respond to sexual misconduct.

KANSAS CITY, Mo. — Bishop Robert Finn wasn’t going anywhere.

He never alerted authorities about photos of young girls’ genitals stashed on a pastor’s laptop. He kept parishioners in the dark, letting the priest mingle with children and families. Even after a judge found the bishop guilty of failing to report the priest’s suspected child abuse — and after 200,000 people petitioned for his ouster — he refused to go.

“I got this job from John Paul II. There’s his signature right there,” Finn had told a prospective deacon shortly after the priest’s arrest in 2011, pointing to the late pontiff’s photo. “And that’s who I answer to.”

Sixteen years after the clergy sexual abuse crisis exploded in Boston, the American Catholic Church is again mired in scandal. This time, the controversy is propelled not so much by priests in the rectories as by the leadership, bishops across the country who like Finn have enabled sexual misconduct or in some cases committed it themselves.

More than 130 US bishops — or nearly one-third of those still living — have been accused during their careers of failing to adequately respond to sexual misconduct in their dioceses, according to a Boston Globe and Philadelphia Inquirer examination of court records, media reports, and interviews with church officials, victims, and attorneys.

At least 15, including Cardinal Theodore McCarrick, the former archbishop of Washington who resigned in July, have themselves been accused of committing such abuse or harassment.

Most telling, the analysis shows that the claims against more than 50 bishops center on incidents that occurred after a historic 2002 Dallasgathering of US bishops where they promised that the church’s days of concealment and inaction were over. By an overwhelming, though not unanimous, vote, church leaders voted to remove any priest who had ever abused a minor and set up civil...

Read the rest of the story here.


Showing 2 comments

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
Secured Via NationBuilder
  • Richard Kensinger, MSW
    commented 2018-11-05 16:28:44 -0600
    I reside in the Altoona-Johnstown Diocese in PA. 46 of the 50 persons noted in our Attorney General Report are clergy. It is quite clear that our two prior bishops were very involved in cover-ups. Our present Bishop is Mark Bartchack and he appears to be very cooperative with both the state probe, and now the federal one. He has initiated significant reforms re clergy sex abuse and has assembled a very capable commission which could indeed be a reform that is a national model. I have spoken to one of the reporters from the Boston Globe in this regard.

    Though in our weekly Catholic Register he has been very silent in speaking out as the Pope and others do? And, to the best of my knowledge, has he or any of our priests held frequent face-to-face encounters w/ the faithful in each church. This worries me. I have divorced the Church, and will continue to provide clinical advocacy for our abused youth.
    Rich, MSW
  • Richard Kensinger, MSW
    followed this page 2018-11-05 16:28:31 -0600

SNAP Network is a GuideStar Silver Participant