Mr. McCarrick had been on the job as Washington archbishop for only a year when the Boston Globe exposed decades of widespread sexual abuse by Catholic clergy in the Boston area and that church officials had known about it for years. Mr. McCarrick emerged as the popular public face of the church’s response to a growing national crisis.
He was the de facto spokesman for a 2002 Vatican conclave of American cardinals with Pope John Paul II on sexual abuse of children and adolescents by American priests. He was among the first leaders of the church to advocate a “zero tolerance,” “one-strike-you’re-out” policy for such abuses. Civil authorities should always be notified, he insisted.
Asked how it was that he became the spokesman for the conclave in Rome, Mr. McCarrick joked that the other cardinals, whom he usually called “fellas,” “can run faster than I do.”
Mr. McCarrick turned 75 in the summer of 2005 and, in accordance with Vatican policy, tendered his resignation to the pope. It was not immediately accepted, but in May 2006, he was replaced by Donald Wuerl, the bishop of Pittsburgh.
He became one of a “number of senior churchmen who were more or less put out to pasture during the eight-year pontificate of Benedict XVI,” journalist David Gibson wrote in a 2014 article distributed by the Religion News Service.
After the ascension of Pope Francis in 2013, Mr. McCarrick participated extensively in papal missions, including to the Philippines to console typhoon victims, to China and Iran for talks on religious freedom and nuclear proliferation, and to the Holy Land for a papal visit in 2014.
Mr. McCarrick’s public stand on the issue of sexual abuse made it all the more unsettling when, in 2018, the allegations against him became public.
In 1971, when he was still a monsignor in the New York archdiocese, he allegedly made sexual advances toward a 16-year-old boy during preparations for Christmas services at St. Patrick’s Cathedral. The boy was accosted again in 1972, according to his attorney, who came forward with the details.
The alleged victim did not speak to church authorities about the alleged abuse until 2016, when the New York archdiocese established a compensation program. Mr. McCarrick said he became aware of the allegation in 2017.
In a statement, Mr. McCarrick said: “While I have absolutely no recollection of this reported abuse, and believe in my innocence, I am sorry for the pain the person who brought the charges has gone through, as well as for the scandal such charges cause our people.”
Church officials also announced the three lawsuits involving adults. The accusations dated from Mr. McCarrick’s time as bishop of Metuchen, New Jersey, in the 1980s, and as archbishop of Newark, from 1986 until he took office in Washington. The settlements were reached in 2005 and 2007, according to a Times investigative story published in 2018.
According to the Times, between 1994 and 2008, a number of reports about Mr. McCarrick’s allegedly inappropriate behavior with adult seminary students were sent to American bishops, the highest papal diplomat in Washington and Pope Benedict. Many of these episodes of alleged sexual misconduct, the Times said, occurred at a New Jersey beach house that the Metuchen diocese bought at then-Bishop McCarrick’s request in 1984.
Later in July 2018, the Times published the story of a 60-year-old man who said he was 11 when Mr. McCarrick exposed himself to him in the first act of nearly 20 years of abuse.
The man, identified in the article as James, said Mr. McCarrick, a friend of the family, first touched his penis when he was 13. He described sexually abusive contact that allegedly continued through his teens.
In 2021, at age 91, Mr. McCarrick was criminally charged with sexually assaulting a 16-year-old boy in 1974 during a wedding reception in Massachusetts. Mr. McCarrick, the country’s highest-ranking Catholic official to face criminal charges stemming from the sex abuse crisis that roiled the church, pleaded not guilty.
In that case, a district judge in Massachusetts ruled in 2023 that Mr. McCarrick was not competent to stand trial. A state forensic psychologist had assessed the former cardinal during an examination over the summer and testified that Mr. McCarrick had significant cognitive impairment with “deficits of his memory and ability to retain information.”
As investigations nationally identified thousands more victims and abusive priests, allegations against Mr. McCarrick continued to surface. In 2023, he faced another sexual assault charge in Wisconsin, stemming from abuse that allegedly occurred in the late 1970s. The case was suspended the next year after Mr. McCarrick was deemed unfit for trial.

Mr. McCarrick in 2011, years before he was defrocked. (Patrick Semansky/AP)
Information on survivors was not immediately available.
“McCarrick was never held accountable for his crimes," the Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests, a victims group, said in a statement after the former cardinal’s death. "While he was eventually removed from public ministry, defrocked, and stripped of his red hat, he never stood trial for the vast harm he inflicted on children, young adults, seminarians, and others under his power. … The McCarrick story is not just about one man. It is about the system that enabled him.”
To 500,000 Catholics in the Washington area, where Mr. McCarrick was once warmly remembered as archbishop, the allegations that surfaced in 2018 were searing.
“It’s especially painful for social justice Catholics,” John Gehring, a writer who worked for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops during Mr. McCarrick’s tenure as Washington archbishop, told The Post. “He’d be at a social justice rally. You’d see him on the Metro. I was always struck by that simplicity. … He was this global prince of the church, but he understood the local church. This underscores the cancer of clergy abuse.”
Showing 1 comment