Vatican’s envoy accuses Irish government of mishandling compensation

Vatican’s envoy accuses Irish government of mishandling compensation

By Paddy Agnew

May 7, 2014

In what may have been a moment of confusion, the Vatican’s permanent representative at the UN in Geneva yesterday accused the Government of “mishandling” money paid by way of compensation to Magdalene laundries victims.

Appearing before the UN’s Committee Against Torture, Archbishop Silvano Tomasi was asked by US human rights activist Felice Gaer if any such compensation had been paid.

Archbishop Tomasi replied: “With regard to the Magdalene [victims], we have already answered this question at the Committee for the Rights of the Child [four months ago], but just for your information, you should know that the four religious orders of nuns involved have contributed $440 million to the [Irish] government to take care of the victims of that situation.

“In part, the government has mishandled that money and they came back to ask for more money, so some of the orders then said, ‘We don’t want to pay any more money because it is not going to be used properly’. That is what I know at this point.”

Archbishop Tomasi may have confused contributions made by a number of religious congregations to the Residential Institutions Redress Scheme (industrial schools for children) with non-existent contributions to a Magdalene compensatory scheme.

Department of Justice

Last night, the Department of Justice confirmed that the four orders involved in the running of the Magdalene laundries – the Sisters of Mercy, the Sisters of Our Lady of Charity of the Refuge, the Good Shepherd Sisters and the Sisters of Charity – had contributed in relation to institutions and industrial schools run by them for children.

“To the best of our knowledge,” the department added, “these contributions were committed before the McAleese [Magdalene] committee even started its work and it has never been suggested to us by the congregations concerned that such contributions were in any way linked to the Magdalene scheme.”

Furthermore, the four orders have all at different times publicly declined to contribute to any proposed Magdalene compensation scheme.

After Archbishop Tomasi had made similar comments about compensation payments to the UN Committee for the Rights of the Child in January, Minister of Justice Alan Shatter wrote to the Holy See seeking further “clarification”.

If a certain confusion between one Irish church scandal/report (Ryan) and another one (Magdalene Laundries) is understandable, it is remarkable that, at a distance of four months, the Holy See has repeated its (albeit genuine) error. In theory, two United Nations committees now believe the Magdalene victims have all been well compensated – whereas this is not the case at all.

Vatican line

Also asked yesterday about the alleged failure of “an Irish papal nuncio” (Archbishop Giuseppe Lazzarotto in 2006) to co-operate with the Murphy commission, Archbishop Tomasi repeated the oft-used Vatican line that the request for information had not been made “in a proper way . . . through diplomatic channels”.

Read the whole story here. 

Showing 2 reactions

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.

  • commented 2014-05-07 16:29:54 -0500
    The Catholic church is filled with hypocrisy. On one hand, the Vatican claims it is not responsible nor can they do anything about pedophile clergy, yet they come down hard on rebellious priests and nuns. So they obviously do have control. I guess no one in the Vatican has ever read about telling “untruths” is a sin…………….
  • commented 2014-05-07 15:49:19 -0500
    For me, observing the UN hearing yesterday, as well as the joint SNAP and CCR webcast afterwards, and now reading this article; it’s extremely hard to have hope that the catholic church will be a place and institution that I would ever like, repsect and again want to be a member. I continue to be appalled at the way (all of) the priesthood deals with pedophile catholics and other criminal catholics who abet them. It sickens and disgusts me how they take on and handle the representation of such criminals as if their acts did not happen and the victims do not exist.
    To work hard to figure ways to lie about this, and to work hard to figure out ways to push away and deny responsibility for denying restitution and denying that the pedophile priests have obviously prevailed against the non-pedophile catholic priests because it is obvious that the non-pedophile priests (if any, in fact exist) have not managed pulliing together and united to put an end to all of this,
    In fact, whenever I look at the new pope’s visage, all I can now see is an ugly, creepy old man who aides and abbets pedophiles, and may well be one himself. (You may be sure, that I now try to avoid ever looking at him on the news or in magazines or online.)