For immediate release: Wednesday, March 5, 2014
Statement by David Clohessy of St. Louis, Director of SNAP, the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests (314 566 9790, SNAPclohessy@aol.com)
The pope said he is “offended.” Apparently, he's not really offended by Catholic officials who transfer predators and keep secrets and endanger kids. He's offended by the “hype” around his papacy.
We feel the same way, even more now that he has shown his 'true colors' on the church's on-going clergy sex abuse and cover up crisis.
The Associate Press reports that:
“Pope Francis is coming under increasing criticism that he doesn't get it on sex abuse. Three months after the Vatican announced a commission of experts to study best practices on protecting children, no action has been taken, no members appointed, no statute outlining the commission's scope approved.
Francis hasn't met with any victims, hasn't moved to oust a bishop convicted of failing to report a problem priest, and on Wednesday insisted that the church had been unfairly attacked on abuse, using the defensive rhetoric of the Vatican from a decade ago.”
When he says that abuse has left "very deep wounds" on victims, the pope is deliberately framing the scandal as something that's largely in the past – by focusing on already hurt victims, not on still-vulnerable children. This is good public relations but it's not reality. While many clergy sex crimes have been disclosed in the West, far fewer cover ups have been, and little of either has been disclosed in the developing world. No matter how hard Catholic officials may try to depict this scandal as “in the past,” it's very much a part of the church right now.
Inadvertently, Pope Francis has done our movement to protect children a service. For months, many have assumed he would sooner or later get around to taking action to safeguard the vulnerable in the church. Over and over, we heard well-meaning Catholics and commentators say “Give him time, he's new,” “He's improving Vatican governance first,” “He's got to tackle internal leaks first,” “Streamlining church bureaucracy is his top priority,” and “He can't do everything at once.”
Now, there's more clarity and less doubt about his intentions on abuse. He's willing to discuss change in several parts of the church. But not when it comes to pedophile priests and complicit bishops.
Many consider the pope as a moral authority. He says that only the Catholic Church has been attacked on abuse. If he honestly believes that other institutions are dealing with abuse in reckless ways, we would welcome him exposing and denouncing them.
On a personal level, as a parent, and the brother of a predator priest, I am very upset by Pope Francis' comments. My brothers (three of them) and I became victims of child sex crimes because a Catholic prelate (Bishop Michael McAuliffe) sent a predator priest (Fr. John Whiteley) to our parish with no warning.
Fr. John was extraordinarily shrewd. And my parents were taught, since birth, by the church they love, to trust clerics. My parents could not have known he was molesting us. So for the pope to imply that parents are to blame for most abuse disgusts me.
Finally, we're saddened to read the AFP report that “Looking back over his first 12 months, the 77-year-old said the one thing he would change would be to tone down the near-mythical status he has acquired in some circles.”
We wish his regret was not cooperating with prosecutors who want an accused child molesting Polish archbishop extradited. Or not cooperating with United Nations officials who asked for information on clergy sex cases. Or not demoting convicted Missouri bishop who enabled a child molesting cleric to hurt more kids while he hid evidence from police. Or not ordering bishops to report suspected child sex crimes to secular authorities, no matter if they are mandated to do so or not. Or having met with Cardinal Roger Mahony in January or Cardinal Bernard Law last March. Or having promised an abuse commission more than three months ago but failing to set it up yet. Or not disbanding the scandal-ridden Legion of Christ. Or not pushing for updated and stronger secular child safety laws. The list goes on and on.
In his most recent audience, the pope explained that Lent is a time for "a turnaround," to convert and change for the better. We have little optimism that he will change his church's long-standing, deeply-rooted and extremely hurtful approach to those who commit and conceal heinous sexual violence against kids.
(SNAP, the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests, is the world’s oldest and largest support group for clergy abuse victims. We’ve been around for 25 years and have more than 15,000 members. Despite the word “priest” in our title, we have members who were molested by religious figures of all denominations, including nuns, rabbis, bishops, and Protestant ministers. Our website is SNAPnetwork.org)
Contact - David Clohessy (314-566-9790 cell, SNAPclohessy@aol.com), Barbara Dorris (314-862-7688 home, 314-503-0003 cell, SNAPdorris@gmail.com), Barbara Blaine (312-399-4747, SNAPblaine@gmail.com), Peter Isely (414-429-7259, firstname.lastname@example.org), Judy Jones 636-433-2511, email@example.com) Joelle Casteix (949-322-7434, firstname.lastname@example.org)
Unarguably the Child Safety Programs/Measures/Resources implemented by the Bishops in response to the Clergy Abuse Scandal are designed to protect the Bishops, not the children!
EXCERPTS from the article: ‘Safe Environment Programs: Your Excellency’s Elixir’:
(start quote) From promiscuity to the horrendous problem of sexual abuse, the “remedy” offered by our callous bishops is more and more sex education. The sexual abuse programs now being pushed so hard by the bishops are just their crafty and cunning attempt to pretend they care about children.
Bishops hide the programs from parents because the child abuse prevention programs almost exclusively target parents, grandparents, aunts and uncles as the abusers. The bishops’ sex abuse programs continue to bring pornographic materials into the youngest of grades and call it “age appropriate.” All this sex information is geared at desensitizing the child about sexual language, genitalia, and sexual acts.
Young parents are dumbfounded when they learn the extent of perversion being foisted on innocent young children by bishops. These same bishops maliciously harbored, protected, and thereby facilitated the homosexual sodomites who have physically, spiritually, mentally and socially destroyed untold numbers of young boys. These men, who call themselves bishops, are blackened by the sins of what they have done and what they have failed to do.
What do bishops have to gain by further enlarging child sex abuse prevention programs instead of removing sodomites from the priesthood? The least known purpose of such programs is that they are dangerously anti-child and anti-parent. From such information false statistics will be created. Such “reported suspected abuse” is an attempt to fabricate false statistics that would make the parents and families appear abusive, thereby directing attention away from bishops and priests. (end quote)
1) Citation: Source: Mother’s Watch Blog / Link: http://www.motherswatch.net/content/view/7/17/
Article: Safe Environment Programs: Your Excellency’s Elixir