Pressuring harassers to quit can end up protecting them

Pressuring harassers to quit can end up protecting them

 January 5, The Washington Post

When I learned that Judge Alex Kozinski was retiring, after more than a dozen women accused him of inappropriate conduct and sexualized comments, part of me was relieved.

I clerked for Kozinski in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit 14 years ago and found his chambers to be a hostile, demeaning and persistently sexualized environment. I had anticipated an arduous apprenticeship with this brilliant jurist and writer. I did not expect how controlling he would be: wanting to approve the location of my apartment, complaining when his clerks wanted salad for lunch instead of whatever he was having.

On one occasion, he crumpled up a printout of an email draft and threw it at me. He regularly diminished women and their accomplishments; when discussing newly selected Supreme Court clerks, he surmised, using a vulgar term, that one was lesbian. On another day, he gestured for me to come over to the computer in his office and asked me to look at a photo — unrelated to any case we were working on — of a nude man. For the rest of my year-long clerkship, I closed the door to my office and communicated with the judge as little as possible.

My experience was mild, though, compared with what other women have reported: how Kozinski showed them pornography on multiple occasions and wanted to know if  . . . 

Read full article here

Comments

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.

  • commented 2018-01-10 11:46:11 -0600
    I read this article and I just don’t see the connection between the title:“Pressuring harassers to quit can end up protecting them” and the rest of the text of the article. In other words-what was said and written about in the body of article did not in any way support the claim that pressuring harassers…can end up protecting them. Maybe someone can explain this to me.