CT- Victims react to new Bridgeport bishop

CT- Victims react to new Bridgeport bishop

For immediate release: July 31, 2013

Statement by David Clohessy of St. Louis, Director of SNAP, the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests (314 566 9790, SNAPclohessy@aol.com)

We see no evidence that Bridgeport’s new bishop has shown any real courage or compassion in the church’s on-going clergy sex abuse and cover up crisis. The crisis has hit the Brooklyn diocese hard – it has 53 proven, admitted and credibly accused priests. We see no indication that during his 25 years in Brooklyn he took any steps that were any different from any Catholic priest anywhere. So we are not encouraged by his promotion.

In Bridgeport, there are 34 proven, admitted and credibly accused priests. Many of them are still alive, few of them are incarcerated, and most are likely living among unsuspecting neighbors. Alerting the public about the whereabouts of these potentially dangerous men should be Caggiano’s first act as Bridgeport’s bishop. Then, he should post their names, photos and whereabouts on the diocesan website and in parish bulletins.

Bridgeport parishioners have endured years of poor leadership. Complacency won’t reverse this. Connecticut Catholics must be vigilant and skeptical. Complacency protects no one. Vigilance is crucial.

Many will be inclined to give Bishop Caggiano the benefit of the doubt. That’s reckless. He’s been a priest for decades, during a crucial time in the church. But he seems to have done little or nothing to distinguish himself from a largely callous, timid and deceptive church hierarchy.

We hope our misgivings about him will be proven wrong. For now, however, we urge everyone in Bridgeport who sees, suspects or suffers child sex crimes or cover ups to contact secular officials, not church officials.

Showing 1 reaction

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.

  • commented 2013-08-01 04:00:36 -0500
    Not much depth on the RCC bishops’ bench if it takes the Vatican over a year to name a new bishop for Bridgeport. The Rochester NY diocese has had no bishop for almost that long; Rome certainly isn’t spending all this time vetting candidates. More likely F1 found B16’s inbox filled to the brim with undone tasks during Pope Emeritus’s meltdown to his resignation. For Rochester, I hope Rome looks somewhere other than Brooklyn for a replacement.
    Ellen Vosbury